linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] gpio: regmap: Make use of 'ngpios' property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7c3IhC115rPbTMw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:07:30 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
	athieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] gpio: regmap: Make use of 'ngpios' property

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:42:26PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 2:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 03:40:15PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:22:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 2:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

...

> > > > > Bart, do you think it can be applied?
> > > >
> > > > Andy,
> > > >
> > > > I really rarely lose track of patches. It's been just under a week
> > > > since this was posted. Please don't ping me to pick things up unless
> > > > I'm not reacting for at least two weeks. I typically leave patches on
> > > > the list for some time to give bots some time to react.
> > >
> > > I see, I thought your cadence is one week, that's why I have pinged you.
> > > Will try to keep this in mind for the future and sorry to interrupt!
> >
> > Btw, if it's easier to you, I can just combine this to my usual PR to you.
> 
> No, that's fine, let's stick to ACPI-only PRs.

Hmm... Is the Intel GPIO stuff should go directly to your tree? Seems I missed
some changes in the flow...

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko