linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] LED1202 / leds-st1202 fixes and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250220150325.GE778229@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:03:25 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Manuel Fombuena <fombuena@...look.com>
Cc: pavel@....cz, corbet@....net, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] LED1202 / leds-st1202 fixes and improvements

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Manuel Fombuena wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Stripping the separators from patch file names and pasting them
> > culminates in a terrible summary.  In no way does this cover-letter
> > describe what you're trying to achieve, why you're trying to achieve it
> > and the consequences for not applying the set.  Nor does it communicate
> > any merge intentions (which is required due to the assumptions made, as
> > described in our previous conversation).
> 
> Do the messages in the diff section of the patches need similar 
> improvements?

You can use the patch-level diff sections to add per-patch changelogs.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]