[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13059366-bf72-4e84-ab6c-032b735edaec@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:41:55 -0800
From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"decui@...rosoft.com" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>, "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com" <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "will@...nel.org"
<will@...nel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: "benhill@...rosoft.com" <benhill@...rosoft.com>,
"bperkins@...rosoft.com" <bperkins@...rosoft.com>,
"sunilmut@...rosoft.com" <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hyperv-next v4 6/6] PCI: hv: Get vPCI MSI IRQ domain from
DeviceTree
On 2/19/2025 3:29 PM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 5:43 PM
[...]
>> }
>
> These changes to rename hv_dev to vmbus_root_device, along with the
> introduction of hv_get_vmbus_root_device(), seem like a separate
> patch from the vPCI changes. The rename is definitely needed because
> "hv_dev" as a symbol is very overloaded. But the rename is "no functional
> change", and it doesn't touch the pci-hyperv.c file. You don't have a
> consumer for hv_get_vmbus_root_device() until the vPCI changes, but
> that seems OK to me to be in the subsequent patch.
>
Thanks, will split the NFC out! I've asked the ACPI maintainers if a
small change in ACPI would be fine to make the functional part of this
patch more palatable, too.
--
Thank you,
Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists