[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f5a1f2d-5ff2-43f8-8964-a992d5554db6@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:31:21 -0500
From: Adam Young <admiyo@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>, admiyo@...amperecomputing.com,
Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/1] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport
On 2/6/25 19:30, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
>> Is that your only concern with this patch?
> Yes, hence the ack. If there are other changes that you end up doing in
> response to other reviews, then please address the spacing thing too,
> but that certainly doesn't warrant a new revision on its own.
>
>> What else would need to happen in order for this to get ACKed at this
>> point?
> It already has an ack from me.
>
> As for actual merging: If the netdev maintainers have further reviews,
> please address those. If not, I assume they would merge in this window.
Should I resubmit this patch with a title that includes net-next in
order for it to be picked up? I can see that there is stuff being
pulled in and net-next for 6.14 is at RC2.
The write up here refers to a patchwork site that has nothing on it.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
Is there a better set of instructions to follow?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jeremy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists