linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: cadence: macb: Modernize statistics reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1510cd3c-b986-4da2-aaa3-0214e4f43fe6@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:22:29 -0500
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
 claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, pabeni@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: cadence: macb: Modernize statistics
 reporting

On 2/20/25 13:18, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:25:09 -0500 Sean Anderson wrote:
>> >> I think this should be deferred until v2 of [1] is applied, to make
>> >> backporting the fix easier.  
>> > 
>> > ETOOLATE :) networking trees don't rebase  
>> 
>> Well, I was expecting a revert and then I would resend this series once
>> the linked patch was applied.
>> 
>> I guess I can send another patch adding locking?
> 
> Assuming the fix is applied to net:
> Will the trees conflict?

Yes.

> If no - will the code in net still work (just lacking lock protection)?
> 
> If there is a conflict you can share a resolution with me and I'll slap
> it on as part of the merge.

OK, what's the best way to create that? git rerere?

--Sean