[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174007597241.1790567.5642220302421438732.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:26:12 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, irogers@...gle.com, cyy@...self.name,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf list: Also append PMU name in verbose mode
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:16:21 +0000, James Clark wrote:
> When listing in verbose mode, the long description is used but the PMU
> name isn't appended. There doesn't seem to be a reason to exclude it
> when asking for more information, so use the same print block for both
> long and short descriptions.
>
> Before:
> $ perf list -v
> ...
> inst_retired
> [Instruction architecturally executed]
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists