linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Add device level exeption support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4ad0222-d08b-4a57-8c8c-569fbe50f63a@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:29:48 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@...disk.com>,
 "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
 "quic_cang@...cinc.com" <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
 "quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com" <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
 "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
 "peter.wang@...iatek.com" <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
 "manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 "minwoo.im@...sung.com" <minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
 "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
 Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
 Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Add device level exeption support

On 2/20/25 2:01 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
>> @@ -419,6 +421,7 @@ enum {
>>   	MASK_EE_TOO_LOW_TEMP		= BIT(4),
>>   	MASK_EE_WRITEBOOSTER_EVENT	= BIT(5),
>>   	MASK_EE_PERFORMANCE_THROTTLING	= BIT(6),
>> +	MASK_EE_DEV_LVL_EXCEPTION	= BIT(7),
>>   };
 >
> I think you need to rebase your work - most probably for-next is best.

Hmm ... I think that Martin expects this kernel branch to be used as
basis for SCSI kernel patches intended for the next merge window:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git/log/?h=staging

Thanks,

Bart.