[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4b312c8-1117-45cd-a3c3-c8747aca51bd@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:44:36 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CXL Boot to Bash - Section 3: Memory (block) Hotplug
On 20.02.25 20:35, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 08:26:21PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 20.02.25 19:43, Gregory Price wrote:
>>
>> There were ideas in how to optimize that (e.g., requiring a new sysfs
>> interface to expose variable-sized blocks), if anybody is interested, please
>> reach out.
>>
>
> Multiple block sizes would allow managing the misaligned issues I
> discussed earlier as well (where a memory region is not aligned to the
> arch-preferred block size). At least in that scenario, the misaligned
> regions could be brought online as minimal block size (256MB) while the
> aligned portions could be brought online in larger (2GB) chunks.
>
> Do you think this would this require a lot of churn to enable? Last I dug
> through hotplug, it seemed to assume block sizes would be uniform. I was
> hesitant to start ripping through it.
There were some discussions around variable-sized memory blocks. But we
cannot rip out the old stuff, because it breaks API and thereby Linux
user space. There would have to be a world switch (e.g., kernel cmdline,
config option)
... and some corner cases are rather nasty (e.g., hotunplugging boot
memory, where we only learn from ACPI which regions actually belong to a
single DIMM; dlpar hotunplugging individual memory blocks of boot memory
IIRC).
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists