linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] tpm_crb: clean-up and refactor check for idle support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0d8682ca28d2ed43d1d0f1b2a28f7d62e4ee2957.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:36:22 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, 
	sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] tpm_crb: clean-up and refactor check for idle
 support

On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 20:09 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Stuart,
> 
> 
> Thank you for the patch. Should you respin, you could spell *clean
> up* 
> in the summary/title with a space.
> 
> The diff looks good.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul

So for the sake of overall good it is better maybe to keep
this immutable as this will make it more plausible for
potential testers.

BR, Jarkko