lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7ejbRN6kGluzVR3@x130>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:49:33 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net/mlx5e: Avoid a hundred
 -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings

On 20 Feb 10:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:07:07 +1030 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:>
>> Here is another alternative for this.  And similarly to the struct_group_tagged()
>> change above, no struct members should be added before or after `struct
>> mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr hdr;` in `struct mlx5e_umr_wqe`:
>
>Gustavo, could you submit this officially?
>

Can we have struct mlx5e_umr_wq_hdr defined anonymously within
mlx5e_umr_wqe? Let's avoid namespace pollution.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ