linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v12 00/26] LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) reducing tlb numbers over 90%

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250220180539.0fadab4b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:05:39 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
 Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com, conduct@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 00/26] LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) reducing tlb
 numbers over 90%

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:41 -0500
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:

> > I'll tell you what would happen in my home town. If someone said
> > that to a co-worker, they would likely be terminated.  
> 
> I can't agree with the "this is a firing offence" approach.

My point was, if this was in a company, it could very well be a firing offense.

> 
> We're a community, no one is employed by anyone else here; we work
> together because we have to and we have to figure out how to get along.
> We work via consensus, not appeals to authority.

As a community, yes, things are different. But we should not have to
tolerate such language.


-- Steve