[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2502202247420.65342@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:19:23 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>
cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@...il.com>, strace-devel@...ts.strace.io,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] syscall.h: introduce syscall_set_nr()
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > May I suggest "[...] after return from syscall_trace_enter() invocation."
> > instead? Minor reformatting might be required for better visual alignment
> > though.
>
> Like this:
> /*
> * New syscall number has to be assigned to regs[2] because
> * it is loaded from there unconditionally after return from
> * syscall_trace_enter() invocation.
> *
> * Consequently, if the syscall was indirect and nr != __NR_syscall,
> * then after this assignment the syscall will cease to be indirect.
> */
Perfect, thank you!
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists