lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250220071327.GL53094@unreal>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:13:27 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Itamar Gozlan <igozlan@...dia.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Use secs_to_jiffies() instead of
 msecs_to_jiffies()

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 03:45:02PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/19/2025 12:49 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > Use secs_to_jiffies() and simplify the code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> 
> nit: this is a cleanup which should have the net-next prefix applied,
> since this doesn't fix any user visible behavior.
> 
> Otherwise, seems like an ok change.

IMHO, completely useless change for old code. I can see a value in new
secs_to_jiffies() function for new code, but not for old code. I want
to believe that people who write kernel patches aware that 1000 msec
equal to 1 sec.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ