[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250220072858.cxjanfdau6hvzdil@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:58:58 +0530
From: 'Manivannan Sadhasivam' <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, fan.ni@...sung.com,
nifan.cxl@...il.com, a.manzanares@...sung.com,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com, cassel@...nel.org, 18255117159@....com,
quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com, quic_krichai@...cinc.com,
gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] PCI: dwc: Add support for vendor specific
capability search
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:44:36AM +0530, Shradha Todi wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > Sent: 18 February 2025 20:11
> > To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; lpieralisi@...nel.org; kw@...ux.com; robh@...nel.org;
> > bhelgaas@...gle.com; jingoohan1@...il.com; Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com; fan.ni@...sung.com; nifan.cxl@...il.com;
> > a.manzanares@...sung.com; pankaj.dubey@...sung.com; cassel@...nel.org; 18255117159@....com;
> > quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com; quic_krichai@...cinc.com; gost.dev@...sung.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] PCI: dwc: Add support for vendor specific capability search
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 04:20:04PM +0530, Shradha Todi wrote:
> > > Add vendor specific extended configuration space capability search API
> > > using struct dw_pcie pointer for DW controllers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>
> >
> > I took this patch and modified to pass the 'struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id' to the API to simplify the callers:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20250218-pcie-qcom-ptm-v1-2-16d7e480d73e@linaro.org
> >
> > - Mani
> >
>
> I saw the series. I'm okay to move that to a common header file to avoid duplication but I feel that this movement will
> cause my patch to become dependent on your PTM series. Since that series in still in v1 stage and mine is already in v6,
> I feel the debugfs patchset will get further delayed. If you are okay, I could take in the changes as part of v7 after waiting
> for some more reviews. Or, the debugfs patches could be reviewed as it is, and the changes or movement could go on top
> of that?
>
You can take my first 2 patches. I'll post my v2 on top of your next version.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists