lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB851046B5C1F8935DA49EE5BF88C42@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:05:40 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Vladimir Oltean
	<vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
	"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, "Y.B. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>,
	"michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com" <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "stable@...r.kernel.org"
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net 8/9] net: enetc: correct the EMDIO base offset for
 ENETC v4

> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:42:46PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > In addition to centrally managing external PHYs through EMIDO device,
> > each ENETC has a set of EMDIO registers to access and manage its own
> > external PHY. When adding i.MX95 ENETC support, the EMDIO base offset
> > was forgot to be updated, which will result in ENETC being unable to
> > manage its external PHY through its own EMDIO registers.
> 
> So this never worked?
> 
Yes, for i.MX95 we use EMDIO device to manage all external PHYs

> If it never worked, does it actually bother anybody?
> 
No, just fix it at the code level, the offset of ENETC v4 is not correct.
So I will remove it from this patch set and add it to net-next tree.
Thanks.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ