[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-4-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:57:01 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/15] gpiolib: rework the wrapper around
gpio_chip::set_multiple()
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Make the existing wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple() consistent
with the one for gpio_chip::set(): make it return int, add a lockdep
assertion, warn on missing set callback and move the code a bit for
better readability.
Add return value checks in all call places.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 040b4689eb8e..b1e7d368bc7d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3490,21 +3490,33 @@ static int gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool value)
* defines which outputs are to be changed
* @bits: bit value array; one bit per output; BITS_PER_LONG bits per word
* defines the values the outputs specified by mask are to be set to
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
*/
-static void gpio_chip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
- unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
+static int gpiochip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
{
+ unsigned int i;
+ int ret;
+
lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
+ if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set_multiple && !gc->set)))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (gc->set_multiple) {
gc->set_multiple(gc, mask, bits);
- } else {
- unsigned int i;
-
- /* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
- for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio)
- gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+ return 0;
}
+
+ /* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
+ for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio) {
+ ret = gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
@@ -3514,7 +3526,7 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
unsigned long *value_bitmap)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc;
- int i = 0;
+ int i = 0, ret;
/*
* Validate array_info against desc_array and its size.
@@ -3537,7 +3549,10 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
bitmap_xor(value_bitmap, value_bitmap,
array_info->invert_mask, array_size);
- gpio_chip_set_multiple(gc, array_info->set_mask, value_bitmap);
+ ret = gpiochip_set_multiple(gc, array_info->set_mask,
+ value_bitmap);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
i = find_first_zero_bit(array_info->set_mask, array_size);
if (i == array_size)
@@ -3614,8 +3629,11 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
} while ((i < array_size) &&
gpio_device_chip_cmp(desc_array[i]->gdev, guard.gc));
/* push collected bits to outputs */
- if (count != 0)
- gpio_chip_set_multiple(guard.gc, mask, bits);
+ if (count != 0) {
+ ret = gpiochip_set_multiple(guard.gc, mask, bits);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
if (mask != fastpath_mask)
bitmap_free(mask);
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists