[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022040-vintage-dissuade-bcc4@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:34:04 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/230] 6.12.16-rc1 review
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:04:23PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2025 13:55, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > On 2025-02-19 14:32, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > >
> > > On 19/02/2025 13:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:12:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 19/02/2025 13:10, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:25:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.16 release.
> > > > > > > There are 230 patches in this series, all will be
> > > > > > > posted as a response
> > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these
> > > > > > > being applied, please
> > > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:25:11 +0000.
> > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/
> > > > > > > patch-6.12.16-rc1.gz
> > > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
> > > > > > > stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > greg k-h
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Test results for stable-v6.12:
> > > > > > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
> > > > > > 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
> > > > > > 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linux version: 6.12.16-rc1-gcf505a9aecb7
> > > > > > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> > > > > > tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
> > > > > > tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
> > > > > > tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The following appear to have crept in again ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> > > > > sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug
> > > > >
> > > > > Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> > > > > sched/deadline: Correctly account for allocated
> > > > > bandwidth during hotplug
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but all of them are there this time. Are you saying none should be
> > > > there? Does 6.14-rc work for you with these targets?
> >
> > > The 1st one definitely shouldn't. That one is still under debug for
> > > v6.14 [0]. I can try reverting only that one and seeing if it now
> > > passes with the 2nd.
> > Most certainly not - you need all three or none:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/905eb8ab-2635-e030-b671-
> > ab045b55f24c@...lied-asynchrony.com/
> >
> > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/ba51a43f-796d-4b79-808a-
> > > b8185905638a@...dia.com/
> >
> > I was about to link to that.. please try 6.14-rc and see if it works for
> > you.
>
> 6.14-rc is still failing for this board. Like I said, and per the above
> thread, that issue is still being debugged.
Ok, I'm dropping them all from both 6.13 and 6.12 now and will push out
-rc2 versions soon.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists