linux-kernel - Re: Add Morton,Peter and David for discussion//Re: [PATCH -next] uprobes: fix two zero old_folio bugs in __replace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <85725388-180b-267c-e121-3af1f1b75f94@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:01:50 +0800
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
	<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de
 Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
	<mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
	<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian
 Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, "Liang,
 Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, linux-mm
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: Add Morton,Peter and David for discussion//Re: [PATCH -next]
 uprobes: fix two zero old_folio bugs in __replace_page()



在 2025/2/20 16:38, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 20.02.25 03:31, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2025/2/20 0:12, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>> On 19.02.25 16:22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>> On 02/18, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, Before your rewrite last merged, How about i change the 
>>>>> solution to
>>>>> just reject them immediately after get_user_page_vma_remote()？
>>>>
>>>> I agree, uprobe_write_opcode() should simply fail if
>>>> is_zero_page(old_page).
>>>
>>> Yes. That's currently only syzkaller that triggers it, not some sane use
>>> case.
>>
>> OK, change as follows:
>>
>> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>> @@ -506,6 +506,12 @@ int uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe
>> *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
>>           if (ret <= 0)
>>                   goto put_old;
>>
>> +       if (WARN(is_zero_page(old_page),
> 
> This can likely be triggered by user space, so do not use WARN.

OK,thanks.

Hi Oleg, is that all right?

Thanks,
Tong.

>