[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lcbigfjrgkckybimqx6cjoogon7nwyztv2tbet62wxbkm7hsyr@nyssicid3kwb>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:10:54 +0100
From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
CC: <kees@...nel.org>, <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>,
<kevinloughlin@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<justinstitt@...gle.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <bhe@...hat.com>, <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<jason.andryuk@....com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
<guoweikang.kernel@...il.com>, <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <apopple@...dia.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<rppt@...nel.org>, <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
<luto@...nel.org>, <glider@...gle.com>, <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <kuan-ying.lee@...onical.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <tj@...nel.org>, <jgross@...e.com>,
<dvyukov@...gle.com>, <baohua@...nel.org>, <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
<dennis@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>, <surenb@...gle.com>,
<kbingham@...nel.org>, <ankita@...dia.com>, <nathan@...nel.org>,
<ziy@...dia.com>, <xin@...or.com>, <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <cl@...ux.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<maz@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <ytcoode@...il.com>,
<xur@...gle.com>, <morbo@...gle.com>, <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] x86: runtime_const used for KASAN_SHADOW_END
On 2025-02-20 at 00:31:08 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 9:20 AM Maciej Wieczor-Retman
><maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> On x86, generic KASAN is setup in a way that needs a single
>> KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET value for both 4 and 5 level paging. It's required
>> to facilitate boot time switching and it's a compiler ABI so it can't be
>> changed during runtime.
>>
>> Software tag-based mode doesn't tie shadow start and end to any linear
>> addresses as part of the compiler ABI so it can be changed during
>> runtime.
>
>KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET is passed to the compiler via
>hwasan-mapping-offset, see scripts/Makefile.kasan (for the INLINE
>mode). So while we can change its value, it has to be known at compile
>time. So I don't think using a runtime constant would work.
I don't know about arm64, but this doesn't seem to work right now on x86. I
think I recall that hwasan-mapping-offset isn't implemented on the x86 LLVM or
something like that? I'm sure I saw some note about it a while ago on the
internet but I couldn't find it today.
Anyway if KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET is not set at compile time it defaults to nothing
and just doesn't get passed into kasan-params a few lines below. I assume that
result seems a little too makeshift for runtime const to make sense here?
>
>Which means that KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET has to have such a value that
>works for both 4 and 5 level page tables. This possibly means we might
>need something different than the first patch in this series.
I'll think again about doing one offset for both paging levels so that it's as
optimal as possible.
>
>But in case I'm wrong, I left comments for the current code below.
>
>> This notion, for KASAN purposes, allows to optimize out macros
>> such us pgtable_l5_enabled() which would otherwise be used in every
>> single KASAN related function.
>>
>> Use runtime_const infrastructure with pgtable_l5_enabled() to initialize
>> the end address of KASAN's shadow address space. It's a good choice
>> since in software tag based mode KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET and
>> KASAN_SHADOW_END refer to the same value and the offset in
>> kasan_mem_to_shadow() is a signed negative value.
>>
>> Setup KASAN_SHADOW_END values so that they're aligned to 4TB in 4-level
>> paging mode and to 2PB in 5-level paging mode. Also update x86 memory
>> map documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog v2:
>> - Change documentation kasan start address to non-dense values.
>>
>> Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.rst | 6 ++++--
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 +--
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 1 +
>> arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c | 5 ++++-
>> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.rst
>> index f2db178b353f..5014ec322e19 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.rst
>> @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ Complete virtual memory map with 4-level page tables
>> ffffe90000000000 | -23 TB | ffffe9ffffffffff | 1 TB | ... unused hole
>> ffffea0000000000 | -22 TB | ffffeaffffffffff | 1 TB | virtual memory map (vmemmap_base)
>> ffffeb0000000000 | -21 TB | ffffebffffffffff | 1 TB | ... unused hole
>> - ffffec0000000000 | -20 TB | fffffbffffffffff | 16 TB | KASAN shadow memory
>> + ffffec0000000000 | -20 TB | fffffbffffffffff | 16 TB | KASAN shadow memory (generic mode)
>> + fffff40000000000 | -8 TB | fffffc0000000000 | 8 TB | KASAN shadow memory (software tag-based mode)
>> __________________|____________|__________________|_________|____________________________________________________________
>> |
>> | Identical layout to the 56-bit one from here on:
>> @@ -130,7 +131,8 @@ Complete virtual memory map with 5-level page tables
>> ffd2000000000000 | -11.5 PB | ffd3ffffffffffff | 0.5 PB | ... unused hole
>> ffd4000000000000 | -11 PB | ffd5ffffffffffff | 0.5 PB | virtual memory map (vmemmap_base)
>> ffd6000000000000 | -10.5 PB | ffdeffffffffffff | 2.25 PB | ... unused hole
>> - ffdf000000000000 | -8.25 PB | fffffbffffffffff | ~8 PB | KASAN shadow memory
>> + ffdf000000000000 | -8.25 PB | fffffbffffffffff | ~8 PB | KASAN shadow memory (generic mode)
>> + ffe0000000000000 | -6 PB | fff0000000000000 | 4 PB | KASAN shadow memory (software tag-based mode)
>> __________________|____________|__________________|_________|____________________________________________________________
>> |
>> | Identical layout to the 47-bit one from here on:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index 6df7779ed6da..f4ef64bf824a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -400,8 +400,7 @@ config AUDIT_ARCH
>>
>> config KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET
>> hex
>> - depends on KASAN
>> - default 0xdffffc0000000000
>> + default 0xdffffc0000000000 if KASAN_GENERIC
>
>Let's put a comment here explaining what happens if !KASAN_GENERIC.
>
>Also, as I mentioned in the first patch, we need to figure out what to
>do with scripts/gdb/linux/kasan.py.
I'll look through the scripts. Maybe it's possible to figure out if 5-level
paging is enabled from there and setup the kasan offset based on that.
>
>>
>> config HAVE_INTEL_TXT
>> def_bool y
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h
>> index a75f0748a4b6..4bfd3641af84 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h
>> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>> #include <linux/const.h>
>> #include <linux/kasan-tags.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> -#define KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET _AC(CONFIG_KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET, UL)
>> +
>> #define KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT 3
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>> * for kernel really starts from compiler's shadow offset +
>> * 'kernel address space start' >> KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT
>> */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
>> +#define KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET _AC(CONFIG_KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET, UL)
>> #define KASAN_SHADOW_START (KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET + \
>> ((-1UL << __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT) >> \
>> KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT))
>> @@ -24,12 +26,22 @@
>> #define KASAN_SHADOW_END (KASAN_SHADOW_START + \
>> (1ULL << (__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT - \
>> KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)))
>> +#endif
>> +
>>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +#include <asm/runtime-const.h>
>> #include <linux/bitops.h>
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
>> +extern unsigned long KASAN_SHADOW_END_RC;
>> +#define KASAN_SHADOW_END runtime_const_ptr(KASAN_SHADOW_END_RC)
>> +#define KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET KASAN_SHADOW_END
>> +#define KASAN_SHADOW_START (KASAN_SHADOW_END - ((UL(1)) << (__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT - KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)))
>
>Any reason these are under __ASSEMBLY__? They seem to belong better
>together with the CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC definitions above.
I remember getting a wall of odd looking compile errors when this wasn't under
assembly. But I'll recheck.
>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #define arch_kasan_set_tag(addr, tag) __tag_set(addr, tag)
>> #define arch_kasan_reset_tag(addr) __tag_reset(addr)
>> #define arch_kasan_get_tag(addr) __tag_get(addr)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> index 0deb4887d6e9..df6c85f8f48f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>> @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ SECTIONS
>>
>> RUNTIME_CONST_VARIABLES
>> RUNTIME_CONST(ptr, USER_PTR_MAX)
>> + RUNTIME_CONST(ptr, KASAN_SHADOW_END_RC)
>>
>> . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
>> index 299a2144dac4..5ca5862a5cd6 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
>> @@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
>> int i;
>>
>> memcpy(early_top_pgt, init_top_pgt, sizeof(early_top_pgt));
>> + unsigned long KASAN_SHADOW_END_RC = pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 0xfff0000000000000 : 0xfffffc0000000000;
>
>I think defining these constants in arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h is
>cleaner than hardcoding them here.
>
Okay, I'll change that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> +
>> + runtime_const_init(ptr, KASAN_SHADOW_END_RC);
>>
>> /*
>> * We use the same shadow offset for 4- and 5-level paging to
>> @@ -372,7 +375,7 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
>> * bunch of things like kernel code, modules, EFI mapping, etc.
>> * We need to take extra steps to not overwrite them.
>> */
>> - if (pgtable_l5_enabled()) {
>> + if (pgtable_l5_enabled() && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)) {
>> void *ptr;
>>
>> ptr = (void *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_offset_k(KASAN_SHADOW_END));
>> --
>> 2.47.1
>>
--
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists