[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e77d268e129b8002e894fc7c16ae0e2faa1cd8dd.camel@ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:48:10 +0000
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
To: "brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"neilb@...e.de"
<neilb@...e.de>,
"idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li
<xiubli@...hat.com>, Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>,
"Dai.Ngo@...cle.com" <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
"johannes@...solutions.net"
<johannes@...solutions.net>,
"chuck.lever@...cle.com"
<chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"anna@...nel.org" <anna@...nel.org>,
"jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"miklos@...redi.hu"
<miklos@...redi.hu>,
"trondmy@...nel.org" <trondmy@...nel.org>,
"anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>, "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"tom@...pey.com"
<tom@...pey.com>,
"senozhatsky@...omium.org" <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
CC: "ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netfs@...ts.linux.dev" <netfs@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-um@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ceph: return the correct dentry on mkdir
On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 10:36 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> ceph already splices the correct dentry (in splice_dentry()) from the
> result of mkdir but does nothing more with it.
>
> Now that ->mkdir can return a dentry, return the correct dentry.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> ---
> fs/ceph/dir.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> index 39e0f240de06..c1a1c168bb27 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> @@ -1099,6 +1099,7 @@ static struct dentry *ceph_mkdir(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
> struct ceph_client *cl = mdsc->fsc->client;
> struct ceph_mds_request *req;
> struct ceph_acl_sec_ctx as_ctx = {};
> + struct dentry *ret = NULL;
I believe that it makes sense to initialize pointer by error here and always
return ret as output. If something goes wrong in the logic, then we already have
error.
> int err;
> int op;
>
> @@ -1166,14 +1167,20 @@ static struct dentry *ceph_mkdir(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
> !req->r_reply_info.head->is_dentry)
> err = ceph_handle_notrace_create(dir, dentry);
> out_req:
> + if (!err && req->r_dentry != dentry)
> + /* Some other dentry was spliced in */
> + ret = dget(req->r_dentry);
> ceph_mdsc_put_request(req);
> out:
> if (!err)
> + /* Should this use 'ret' ?? */
Could we make a decision should or shouldn't? :)
It looks not good to leave this comment instead of proper implementation. Do we
have some obstacles to make this decision?
> ceph_init_inode_acls(d_inode(dentry), &as_ctx);
> else
> d_drop(dentry);
> ceph_release_acl_sec_ctx(&as_ctx);
> - return ERR_PTR(err);
> + if (err)
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + return ret;
What's about this?
return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : ret;
Thanks,
Slava.
> }
>
> static int ceph_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists