[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhT968J3zBxtzJcnW+6AKzDKA4MzBgMYoHHXsEaREAe=ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:16:30 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, keescook@...omium.org,
john.johansen@...onical.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org, mic@...ikod.net,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] LSM: lsm_context in security_dentry_init_security
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 4:08 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Adding the lsm_context was cleaner. Not worth yet another roadblock.
> I will have a patch asap. I'm dealing with a facilities issue at
> Smack Labs (whole site being painted, everything in disarray) that
> is slowing things down.
Sorry for the delay today, I was distracted by some meetings and
wrestling with gcc v15 on my Fedora Rawhide dev/test system while I
try to test the LSM init patchset. Anyway, I'll add my comments to
Stephen's formal patch posting.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists