[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022102-another-balmy-fe4d@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:57:26 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers: base: devres: Allow to release group on
device release
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 05:48:10PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:24:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:05:37PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > When releasing a device, if the release action causes a group to be
> > > released, a warning is emitted because it can't find the group. This
> > > happens because devres_release_all() moves the entire list to a todo
> > > list and also move the group markers. Considering r* normal resource
> > > nodes and g1 a group resource node:
> > >
> > > g1 -----------.
> > > v v
> > > r1 -> r2 -> g1[0] -> r3-> g[1] -> r4
> > >
> > > After devres_release_all(), dev->devres_head becomes empty and the todo
> > > list it iterates on becomes:
> > >
> > > g1
> > > v
> > > r1 -> r2 -> r3-> r4 -> g1[0]
> > >
> > > When a call to component_del() is made and takes down the aggregate
> > > device, a warning like this happen:
> > >
> > > RIP: 0010:devres_release_group+0x362/0x530
> > > ...
> > > Call Trace:
> > > <TASK>
> > > component_unbind+0x156/0x380
> > > component_unbind_all+0x1d0/0x270
> > > mei_component_master_unbind+0x28/0x80 [mei_hdcp]
> > > take_down_aggregate_device+0xc1/0x160
> > > component_del+0x1c6/0x3e0
> > > intel_hdcp_component_fini+0xf1/0x170 [xe]
> > > xe_display_fini+0x1e/0x40 [xe]
> > >
> > > Because the devres group corresponding to the hdcp component cannot be
> > > found. Just ignore this corner case: if the dev->devres_head is empty
> > > and the caller is trying to remove a group, it's likely in the process
> > > of device cleanup so just ignore it instead of warning.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> Thanks. Is it ok to take these 3 through the drm tree or are you taking
> it through yours?
As the drm patches depened on these, I figured they should all go
through the drm tree, so please feel free to take them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists