linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: compatible reset with old DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7gosm7PJMR0zCg4@eldamar.lan>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:18:10 +0100
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Cc: Valentin Kleibel <valentin@...is.at>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Jianfeng Liu <liujianfeng1994@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: compatible reset
 with old DT

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 12:45:34PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 2:03 PM CET, Valentin Kleibel wrote:
> >>> Chukun Pan (1):
> >>>    phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: compatible reset with old DT
> >> 
> >> Applied, thanks!
> >> 
> >> [1/1] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: compatible reset with old DT
> >>        commit: bff68d44135ce6714107e2f72069a79476c8073d
> >
> > Thanks for your work!
> > We found your patch after NVMes stopped working on a rock 3A with newer 
> > kernels and successfully applied it to kernel 6.1.128 (currently in debian).
> 
> FTR: I've reported it in Debian here: https://bugs.debian.org/1098250
> 
> I confirmed it (also) broke on kernel 6.12.8-1.

FWIW, we have several users in Debian reporting the problem, so if it
can be applied to mainline and then flow down to one of the next round
of stable series down to 6.1.y that would be highly appreicated.

Diederik, if you were able to test the fix, you might contribute a
Tested-by (although as I undestsand its not strictly needed at this
point as commit should be on way to mainline and stable series)?

Regards,
Salvatore