lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <TY3PR01MB113468D1C6E2EC2EBA903BC4986C72@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:21:20 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
CC: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	"oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, Geert
 Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Prabhakar
 Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v23 3/4] pwm: Add support for RZ/G2L GPT

Hi Uwe,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Biju Das
> Sent: 09 January 2025 09:33
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v23 3/4] pwm: Add support for RZ/G2L GPT
> 
> Hi Uwe,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
> > Sent: 09 January 2025 09:23
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 3/4] pwm: Add support for RZ/G2L GPT
> >
> > Hello Biju,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:13:09PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Please let me know, if there is any feedback for this patch series
> > > or any new API to be adapted in next kernel version which simplifies
> > > the code, So that I can send next
> > version.
> >
> > I didn't look, but if you're ambitious you can convert your driver to the waveform callbacks.
> 
> Is it ok, after the acceptance of initial version, will switch to waveform callbacks to enable the
> users of GPT(Reason: lot of customers are using GPT for backlight for LCD panels)?
> 
> Please let me know.
> 
> Is there any documentation available for waveform callback? What scenarios we can use Waveform
> callbacks compared to traditional one?
> 
> > Otherwise I didn't take a look into this revision yet (also because of the kernel bot message).
> 
> I just need to remove unused variable, that is a simple fix.

Gentle ping.

Cheers,
Biju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ