[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc72420c-65f1-4ea7-a702-60188c89aa64@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:52:52 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Ajit Pandey
<quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
"Jagadeesh Kona" <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add compatible for
QCM6490 boards
On 2/21/2025 2:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 09:52:50AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Add the new QCM6490 compatible to support the reset functionality for
>> Low Power Audio subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc.yaml | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc.yaml
>> index 488d63959424088ede67835eb4dcf3feef6d0848..64efb2c533d1e71a9bdc3bf0d245b00cec00841a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc.yaml
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ description: |
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> enum:
>> + - qcom,qcm6490-lpassaudiocc
>> - qcom,sc7280-lpassaoncc
>> - qcom,sc7280-lpassaudiocc
>> - qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc
>> @@ -68,7 +69,9 @@ allOf:
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> - const: qcom,sc7280-lpassaudiocc
>> + enum:
>> + - qcom,sc7280-lpassaudiocc
>> + - qcom,qcm6490-lpassaudiocc
>
> Alphabetical order... although now I question whether these are
> compatible. Nothing in commit msg explains this, but it should.
>
Sure, I will add the details of why we need this in the commit.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists