lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mseffyh7.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:17:40 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>,  "Anna-Maria Behnsen"
 <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,  "Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@...nel.org>,
  "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,  "Danilo Krummrich"
 <dakr@...nel.org>,  "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,  "Boqun Feng"
 <boqun.feng@...il.com>,  "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>,  Björn Roy Baron
 <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,  "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,  "Trevor
 Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,  "Lyude Paul" <lyude@...hat.com>,  "Guangbo
 Cui" <2407018371@...com>,  "Dirk Behme" <dirk.behme@...il.com>,  "Daniel
 Almeida" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,  "Tamir Duberstein"
 <tamird@...il.com>,  <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
  <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Timothy G."
 <c6qchwbke@...ay.firefox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/14] rust: hrtimer: add `HrTimerMode`

"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me> writes:

> On 18.02.25 14:27, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> +/// Operational mode of [`HrTimer`].
>> +#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
>> +pub enum HrTimerMode {
>> +    /// Timer expires at the given expiration time.
>> +    Absolute,
>> +    /// Timer expires after the given expiration time interpreted as a duration from now.
>> +    Relative,
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    Pinned,
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in soft irq context.
>> +    Soft,
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in hard irq context.
>> +    Hard,
>> +    /// Timer expires at the given expiration time.
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    AbsolutePinned,
>> +    /// Timer expires after the given expiration time interpreted as a duration from now.
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    RelativePinned,
>> +    /// Timer expires at the given expiration time.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in soft irq context.
>> +    AbsoluteSoft,
>> +    /// Timer expires after the given expiration time interpreted as a duration from now.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in soft irq context.
>> +    RelativeSoft,
>> +    /// Timer expires at the given expiration time.
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in soft irq context.
>> +    AbsolutePinnedSoft,
>> +    /// Timer expires after the given expiration time interpreted as a duration from now.
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in soft irq context.
>> +    RelativePinnedSoft,
>> +    /// Timer expires at the given expiration time.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in hard irq context.
>> +    AbsoluteHard,
>> +    /// Timer expires after the given expiration time interpreted as a duration from now.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in hard irq context.
>> +    RelativeHard,
>> +    /// Timer expires at the given expiration time.
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in hard irq context.
>> +    AbsolutePinnedHard,
>> +    /// Timer expires after the given expiration time interpreted as a duration from now.
>> +    /// Timer does not move between CPU cores.
>> +    /// Timer handler is executed in hard irq context.
>> +    RelativePinnedHard,
>> +}
>
> At some point we probably want to move this to bitfields, or do you
> think it's better to keep it like this?

Yes, eventually the would transition. The main difficulty is that not
all flag combinations are legal, and the zero value is also a flag.
There was some promising work being shared on Zulip for this [1], but I
don't think it is completed yet. Added Timothy to CC.

[1] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/291565-Help/topic/Best.20way.20to.20handle.20enum.2Fflags.20situation

>> +
>> +impl From<HrTimerMode> for bindings::hrtimer_mode {
>> +    fn from(value: HrTimerMode) -> Self {
>> +        use bindings::*;
>> +        match value {
>> +            HrTimerMode::Absolute => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_ABS,
>> +            HrTimerMode::Relative => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_REL,
>> +            HrTimerMode::Pinned => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_PINNED,
>> +            HrTimerMode::Soft => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT,
>> +            HrTimerMode::Hard => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_HARD,
>> +            HrTimerMode::AbsolutePinned => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED,
>> +            HrTimerMode::RelativePinned => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED,
>> +            HrTimerMode::AbsoluteSoft => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_SOFT,
>> +            HrTimerMode::RelativeSoft => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT,
>> +            HrTimerMode::AbsolutePinnedSoft => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED_SOFT,
>> +            HrTimerMode::RelativePinnedSoft => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED_SOFT,
>> +            HrTimerMode::AbsoluteHard => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_HARD,
>> +            HrTimerMode::RelativeHard => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD,
>> +            HrTimerMode::AbsolutePinnedHard => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED_HARD,
>> +            HrTimerMode::RelativePinnedHard => hrtimer_mode_HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED_HARD,
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +impl From<HrTimerMode> for u64 {
>> +    fn from(value: HrTimerMode) -> Self {
>> +        Into::<bindings::hrtimer_mode>::into(value) as u64
>> +    }
>> +}
>
> Hmm do drivers really need these impls? If not, then you could also just
> have a private function that does the conversion and use it only in the
> abstraction layer.

Similar to the other impls you commented on, I can move them private. I
would prefer using `From` rather than some other function.


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ