[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250221095633.506678-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:56:31 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrei Homescu <ahomescu@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Explicitly cast return value from FFA_VERSION before comparison
The return value ver.a0 is unsigned long type and FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED
is a negative value.
Since the return value from the firmware can be just 32-bit even on
64-bit systems as FFA specification mentions it as int32 error code in
w0 register, explicitly casting to s32 ensures correct sign interpretation
when comparing against a signed error code FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.
Without casting, comparison between unsigned long and a negative
constant could lead to unintended results due to type promotions.
Fixes: 3bbfe9871005 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add initial Arm FFA driver support")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu <ahomescu@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
index 254aa57ddafd..a77bb205ff7d 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int ffa_version_check(u32 *version)
.a0 = FFA_VERSION, .a1 = FFA_DRIVER_VERSION,
}, &ver);
- if (ver.a0 == FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
+ if ((s32)ver.a0 == FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
pr_info("FFA_VERSION returned not supported\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists