lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <utqnfxii5zrqafturex5tyu4ufociw2uojdtiqrs6mezjkcf53@mtxl3g74c44u>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:58:49 +0800
From: Coly Li <i@...y.li>
To: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, song@...nel.org, colyli@...nel.org, 
	yukuai3@...wei.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, 
	dave.jiang@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com, dlemoal@...nel.org, yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev, 
	kch@...dia.com, hare@...e.de, zhengqixing@...wei.com, john.g.garry@...cle.com, 
	geliang@...nel.org, xni@...hat.com, colyli@...e.de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] badblocks: Fix error shitf ops

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:10:58PM +0800, Zheng Qixing wrote:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@...nel.org>

Thanks.
 
> 'bb->shift' is used directly in badblocks. It is wrong, fix it.
> 
> Fixes: 3ea3354cb9f0 ("badblocks: improve badblocks_check() for multiple ranges handling")
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
> ---
>  block/badblocks.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
> index db4ec8b9b2a8..bcee057efc47 100644
> --- a/block/badblocks.c
> +++ b/block/badblocks.c
> @@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>  		/* round the start down, and the end up */
>  		sector_t next = s + sectors;
>  
> -		rounddown(s, bb->shift);
> -		roundup(next, bb->shift);
> +		rounddown(s, 1 << bb->shift);
> +		roundup(next, 1 << bb->shift);
>  		sectors = next - s;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1157,8 +1157,8 @@ static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
>  		 * isn't than to think a block is not bad when it is.
>  		 */
>  		target = s + sectors;
> -		roundup(s, bb->shift);
> -		rounddown(target, bb->shift);
> +		roundup(s, 1 << bb->shift);
> +		rounddown(target, 1 << bb->shift);
>  		sectors = target - s;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1288,8 +1288,8 @@ static int _badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>  
>  		/* round the start down, and the end up */
>  		target = s + sectors;
> -		rounddown(s, bb->shift);
> -		roundup(target, bb->shift);
> +		rounddown(s, 1 << bb->shift);
> +		roundup(target, 1 << bb->shift);
>  		sectors = target - s;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
Coly Li

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ