[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d68e179d-73ac-48d0-acb1-aab644cdf8c6@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 11:57:37 +0100
From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui
<rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Convert to YAML
On 22.02.2025 10:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:16:23PM +0100, Artur Weber wrote:
>> Convert devicetree bindings for the Broadcom BCM59056 PMU MFD from
>> TXT to YAML format. This patch does not change any functionality;
>> the bindings remain the same.
>>
>> The bindings have been split into two parts: the MFD binding and
>> a separate binding for the regulator node, to simplify the addition
>> of other models later (which have different regulators).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Replace mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml with mfd/brcm,bcm590xx.yaml in
>> regulator binding description
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Made $ref use full schema path
>> - Cleaned up example
>> - Dropped regulator name list comment
>> - Changed description of regulator binding to mention BCM59056
>> explicitly
>> - Changed "Power Management IC" to "Power Management Unit" to match
>> official Broadcom naming
>> - Renamed mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml to mfd/brcm,bcm590xx.yaml
>
> I don't understand why the name became "xx", instead of matching exactly
> compatible. It wasn't like this when I reviewed it last time and this is
> really unexpected change.
>
> Please follow standard rules: filename must match compatible.
The change was mostly to make it more generic; it felt a bit weird that
the BCM59054 regulator binding (added in the next patch) referenced a
binding named after BCM59056. But if this is not a problem, and a
concrete model number is required (even if it is only one of the
supported devices), then I'll switch back to the bcm59056 name.
Best regards
Artur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists