[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2500F60C-DEB0-49C8-B67B-49351C802646@live.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:22:36 +0000
From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
To: "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, "linux@...musvillemoes.dk" <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
"senozhatsky@...omium.org" <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, "maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "mripard@...nel.org"
<mripard@...nel.org>, "tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>, "simona@...ll.ch" <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "apw@...onical.com"
<apw@...onical.com>, "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"dwaipayanray1@...il.com" <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
"lukas.bulwahn@...il.com" <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
"sumit.semwal@...aro.org" <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"christian.koenig@....com" <christian.koenig@....com>, Kerem Karabay
<kekrby@...il.com>, Aun-Ali Zaidi <admin@...eit.net>, Orlando Chamberlain
<orlandoch.dev@...il.com>, Atharva Tiwari <evepolonium@...il.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing
List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "linux-media@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Asahi Linux Mailing List
<asahi@...ts.linux.dev>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, Janne Grunau
<j@...nau.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/tiny: add driver for Apple Touch Bars in x86
Macs
> On 22 Feb 2025, at 2:37 PM, Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What padding, please? Why TCP UAPI headers do not have these attributes?
>> Think about it, and think about what actually __packed does and how it affects
>> (badly) the code generation. Otherwise it looks like a cargo cult.
>>
>>> I tried removing __packed btw and driver no longer works.
>>
>> So, you need to find a justification why. But definitely not due to padding in
>> many of them. They can go without __packed as they are naturally aligned.
>
> Alright, I did some debugging, basically printk sizeof(struct). Did it for both packed and unpacked with the following results:
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_request_header is 16
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_request_header_unpacked is 16
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_response_header is 20
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_response_header_unpacked is 20
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_simple_request is 32
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_simple_request_unpacked is 32
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_information is 65
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_msg_information_unpacked is 68
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_frame is 12
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_frame_unpacked is 12
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_fb_request_footer is 80
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_fb_request_footer_unpacked is 80
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_fb_request is 48
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_fb_request_unpacked is 48
>
> Feb 22 13:02:03 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_fb_request_response is 40
> Feb 22 13:02:04 MacBook kernel: size of struct appletbdrm_fb_request_response_unpacked is 40
>
> So, the difference in sizeof in unpacked and packed is only in appletbdrm_msg_information. So, I kept this packed, and removed it from others. The Touch Bar still works.
>
> So maybe keep just this packed?
And for justification why driver was not working, with appletbdrm_msg_information not packed is because sizeof(struct appletbdrm_msg_information) is being used in kzalloc in the driver. Similar is the case for most other __packed structs.
Maybe the author wanted to keep this value consistent across various compiler options? I don’t think CPU architecture really matters here though since this driver is exclusively for x86_64 Intel Macs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists