lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=ctKoDz+Kf7UFBTD-oF17cTHBcrkNN_5cqxQeK609OVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:50:50 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, 
	Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>, Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>, 
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>, 
	Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, 
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add rust bindings entry for bitmap API

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 9:57 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Bitmap developers do their best to keep the API stable. When API or
> user-visible behavior needs to be changed such that it breaks rust,
> bitmap and rust developers collaborate as follows:

If I understand correctly, you are proposing to a "temporarily stable
API", i.e. to add new APIs while keeping old ones for a bit until the
Rust side updates to the new one (including perhaps workarounds in the
helpers when needed). Is that correct?

In other words, while the entry is about the helpers file, the policy
is about all APIs (since some APIs are called directly), right?

(Up to you, Viresh et al., of course, i.e. I am just trying to follow)

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ