[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B09581-F4AA-4196-8445-1E02041915AF@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:06:02 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] PCI: dwc: pcie-qcom-ep: enable EP support for SAR2130P
On 22 February 2025 18:50:38 EET, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 05:52:04PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Enable PCIe endpoint support for the Qualcomm SAR2130P platform. It is
>> impossible to use fallback compatible to any other platform since
>> SAR2130P uses slightly different set of clocks.
>>
>
>Still, why do you want the compatible to be added to the driver? It shall be
>defined in the binding with the respective clock difference. Driver should just
>work with the fallback compatible.
Well, per my understanding (or according to my feeling) different set of clocks means that they are not completely compatible. An Ack from DT maintainers supports this.
Moreover, if we were to declare fallback, which one would you prefer?
>
>- Mani
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists