[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mdzUJocjXhPRQEEdgRXsr+TEMt99V5-9R7TjKB7Dtfaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:41:52 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Ventura Jack <venturajack85@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, airlied@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
david.laight.linux@...il.com, ej@...i.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hch@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Jung <post@...fj.de>
Subject: Re: C aggregate passing (Rust kernel policy)
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> I believe (Miguel was talking about this at one of the conferences,
> maybe he'll chime in) that there was work in progress to solidify the
> aliasing and ownership rules at the unsafe level, but it sounded like it
> may have still been an area of research.
Not sure what I said, but Cc'ing Ralf in case he has time and wants to
share something on this (thanks in advance!).
>From a quick look, Tree Borrows was submitted for publication back in November:
https://jhostert.de/assets/pdf/papers/villani2024trees.pdf
https://perso.crans.org/vanille/treebor/
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists