linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7rcC3YskGoNHdvN@dragon>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:27:55 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the regulator tree

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:43:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the imx-mxs tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   b5ec74c2aec7 ("arm64: dts: imx8mp-skov-reva: Use hardware signal for SD card VSELECT")

Any particular reason you picked this DTS change?  Would you drop it
from regulator tree?

Shawn

> 
> This is commit
> 
>   38db2315c465 ("arm64: dts: imx8mp-skov-reva: Use hardware signal for SD card VSELECT")
> 
> in the imx-mxs tree.