[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7xpU8yKNKBReage@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:42:59 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
Cc: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Gerald Loacker <gerald.loacker@...fvision.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>,
Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@...il.com>,
Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] media: dt-bindings: media: add bindings for
rockchip rk3568 vicap
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:21:41AM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 2/21/25 15:10, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 11:16:34AM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> >> Add documentation for the Rockchip RK3568 Video Capture (VICAP) unit.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
> >> ---
> >> .../bindings/media/rockchip,rk3568-vicap.yaml | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 169 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip,rk3568-vicap.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip,rk3568-vicap.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..3dc15efeb32e
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip,rk3568-vicap.yaml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >> +%YAML 1.2
> >> +---
> >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/rockchip,rk3568-vicap.yaml#
> >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +title: Rockchip RK3568 Video Capture (VICAP)
> >> +
> >> +maintainers:
> >> + - Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
> >> +
> >> +description:
> >> + The Rockchip RK3568 Video Capture (VICAP) block features a digital video
> >> + port (DVP, a parallel video interface) and a MIPI CSI-2 port. It receives
> >> + the data from camera sensors, video decoders, or other companion ICs and
> >> + transfers it into system main memory by AXI bus.
> >> +
> >> +properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + const: rockchip,rk3568-vicap
> >> +
> >> + reg:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + interrupts:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + clocks:
> >> + items:
> >> + - description: ACLK
> >> + - description: HCLK
> >> + - description: DCLK
> >> + - description: ICLK
> >> +
> >> + clock-names:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: aclk
> >> + - const: hclk
> >> + - const: dclk
> >> + - const: iclk
> >> +
> >> + rockchip,cif-clk-delaynum:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> + minimum: 0
> >> + maximum: 127
> >> + description:
> >> + Delay the DVP path clock input to align the sampling phase, only valid
> >> + in dual edge sampling mode.
> >
> > I suppose there's further documentation on this somewhere else? A reference
> > would be nice.
>
> I like your optimism :-) No, I am afraid this single sentence is all the
> the RK3568 TRM has to say about it. I can add a reference to the TRM
> page, but everyone who actually follows this reference will be
> disappointed...
:-(
Is this something that needs to be set? Is there a default, for instance?
If there's documentation available, it'd be nice to refer to that from
somewhere, I'm not sure if the driver or DT bindings would be better.
Probably the driver.
>
> >> +
> >> + iommus:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + resets:
> >> + items:
> >> + - description: ARST
> >> + - description: HRST
> >> + - description: DRST
> >> + - description: PRST
> >> + - description: IRST
> >> +
> >> + reset-names:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: arst
> >> + - const: hrst
> >> + - const: drst
> >> + - const: prst
> >> + - const: irst
> >> +
> >> + rockchip,grf:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >> + description:
> >> + Phandle to general register file used for video input block control.
> >> +
> >> + power-domains:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + ports:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> >> +
> >> + properties:
> >> + port@0:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> >> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> >> + description:
> >> + The digital video port (DVP, a parallel video interface).
> >> +
> >> + properties:
> >> + endpoint:
> >> + $ref: video-interfaces.yaml#
> >> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> >> +
> >> + properties:
> >> + bus-type:
> >> + enum: [5, 6]
> >> +
> >> + required:
> >> + - bus-type
> >> +
> >> + port@1:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> >> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> >> + description: The MIPI CSI-2 port.
> >> +
> >> + properties:
> >> + endpoint:
> >> + $ref: video-interfaces.yaml#
> >> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > Don't you need things like data-lanes here? Or is this a single lane
> > receiver?
>
> This may be a bit confusing, and I probably should extend the
> description a bit. This port/endpoint faces the MIPI CSI Host, which has
> its own driver provided in patch 6. The connection in between is a link
> with some internal format. Hence, no properties required.
>
> This is the same issue as the one discussed in the other thread, since
> the other end of this connection is discussed there. I'll fix the issue
> on both ends using Rob's suggestion.
If this is some custom interface, you should not say it's MIPI CSI-2
(even though MIPI CSI-2 data could be transported on top).
> >> + vicap_mipi: port@1 {
> >> + reg = <1>;
> >
> > Where is the endpoint?
>
> I'll add the endpoint in the example.
Thank you.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists