[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250224024512.GB2153960@tiffany>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:45:12 +0900
From: Hyesoo Yu <hyesoo.yu@...sung.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: janghyuck.kim@...sung.com, vbabka@...e.cz, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes
<rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: slub: call WARN() when the slab detect an
error
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 05:30:59PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:39:44PM +0900, Hyesoo Yu wrote:
> > If a slab object is corrupted or an error occurs in its internal
> > value, continuing after restoration may cause other side effects.
> > At this point, it is difficult to debug because the problem occurred
> > in the past. It is useful to use WARN() to catch errors at the point
> > of issue because WARN() could trigger panic for system debugging when
> > panic_on_warn is enabled. WARN() is added where to detect the error
> > on slab_err and object_err.
> >
> > There are cases where slab_err is called before meaningful logs are
> > printed. If the WARN() in slab_err cause a panic, these logs will not
> > be printed. WARN() should called after these logs are printed. Thus
> > slab_err() is splited to __slab_err that calls the WARN() and it is
> > called after printing logs.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - move the WARN from slab_fix to slab_err, object_err to use WARN on
> > all error reporting paths.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Replace direct calling with BUG_ON with the use of WARN in slab_fix.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hyesoo Yu <hyesoo.yu@...sung.com>
> > Change-Id: I90b2ea9ffc58e3826f7ae9f1a774bb48c2d43bf4
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index de62fed12236..7f0583a71cda 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -5473,8 +5481,7 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
> > remove_partial(n, slab);
> > list_add(&slab->slab_list, &discard);
> > } else {
> > - list_slab_objects(s, slab,
> > - "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()");
> > + list_slab_objects(s, slab);
>
> Could you remove WARN() in kmem_cache_destroy()?
>
> When a cache is destroyed with remaining objects, two WARNINGs being are
> printed, one from list_slab_objects() and another from kmem_cache_destroy().
> The latter becomes redundant with this patch.
>
> The WARN() is added there because it's good to catch such an error.
> At that time, slab_err() and object_err() did not call WARN().
>
Thank you for reviewing the part I missed.
I will remove the WARN in kmem_cache_destory().
Thanks,
Regards.
> > }
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Harry
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists