[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5162cd2c-e239-4fc6-b2da-2e2fe087cb1b@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:49:56 +0800
From: "zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<robert.moore@...el.com>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
<mario.limonciello@....com>, <gautham.shenoy@....com>, <ray.huang@....com>,
<acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <yumpusamongus@...il.com>,
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>, <hepeng68@...wei.com>,
<fanghao11@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq
On 2025/2/24 18:31, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/25 11:07, zhenglifeng (A) wrote:
>> On 2025/2/19 3:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 2:55 AM zhenglifeng (A) <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2025/2/6 21:14, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
>>>>> Add sysfs interfaces for CPPC autonomous selection in the cppc_cpufreq
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch series is organized in two parts:
>>>>>
>>>>> - patch 1-5 refactor out the general CPPC register get and set functions
>>>>> in cppc_acpi.c
>>>>>
>>>>> - patches 6-8 expose sysfs files for users to control CPPC autonomous
>>>>> selection when supported
>>>>>
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>
>>>>> v5:
>>>>>
>>>>> - add more explanation to the commit logs and comments
>>>>> - change REG_OPTIONAL from bin to hex
>>>>> - split patch 2 into 3 smaller patches
>>>>> - remove CPPC_REG_VAL_READ() and CPPC_REG_VAL_WRITE() macros
>>>>> - move the modification part in patch 5 into a separate patch
>>>>> - rename the sysfs file from "energy_perf" to
>>>>> energy_performance_preference_val
>>>>>
>>>>> v4:
>>>>>
>>>>> - add REG_OPTIONAL and IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG to judge if a cpc register is
>>>>> an optional one
>>>>> - check whether the register is optional before CPC_SUPPORTED check in
>>>>> cppc_get_reg_val() and cppc_set_reg_val()
>>>>> - check the register's type in cppc_set_reg_val()
>>>>> - add macros to generally implement registers getting and setting
>>>>> functions
>>>>> - move some logic codes from cppc_cpufreq.c to cppc_acpi.c
>>>>> - replace cppc_get_auto_sel_caps() by cppc_get_auto_sel()
>>>>>
>>>>> v3:
>>>>>
>>>>> - change cppc_get_reg() and cppc_set_reg() name to cppc_get_reg_val() and
>>>>> cppc_set_reg_val()
>>>>> - extract cppc_get_reg_val_in_pcc() and cppc_set_reg_val_in_pcc()
>>>>> - return the result of cpc_read() in cppc_get_reg_val()
>>>>> - add pr_debug() in cppc_get_reg_val_in_pcc() when pcc_ss_id < 0
>>>>> - rename 'cpunum' to 'cpu' in cppc_get_reg_val()
>>>>> - move some macros from drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c to
>>>>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h with a CPPC_XXX prefix
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>>
>>>>> - fix some incorrect placeholder
>>>>> - change kstrtoul to kstrtobool in store_auto_select
>>>>>
>>>>> Lifeng Zheng (8):
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Add IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG macro to judge if a cpc_reg is
>>>>> optional
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Optimize cppc_get_perf()
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Rename cppc_get_perf() to cppc_get_reg_val()
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_set_reg_val()
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Refactor register value get and set ABIs
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Modify cppc_get_auto_sel_caps() to cppc_get_auto_sel()
>>>>> ACPI: CPPC: Add three functions related to autonomous selection
>>>>> cpufreq: CPPC: Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq
>>>>>
>>>>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 54 ++++
>>>>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 303 +++++++++++-------
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 3 +-
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 109 +++++++
>>>>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 30 +-
>>>>> 5 files changed, 372 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gentle ping.
>>>
>>> OK, so I'm wondering how this is related to the patch series at
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20250211103737.447704-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>
>> This series refactors some cppc_acpi ABIs and supports cppc autonomous
>> selection with sysfs files in cpufreq policy. Later, [1] proposed another
>> design with different user interfaces.We will discuss and reach a consensus
>> with regard to this.
>>
>> However, as mentioned in [1], patch 1-7 in this series (the cppc_acpi part)
>> are not related to user interfaces, so can be reviewed and applied
>> separately. I can also send patch 1-7 as a new thread if preferred.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20250211103737.447704-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>
> I tried the patchset on a platform which doesn't implement CPC and everything worked well.
> As Lifeng said,
> PATCH v5 8/8] cpufreq: CPPC: Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq
> seems to be still in discussion, but for patches 1-7 FWIW:
>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Thank you!
Regards,
Lifeng
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Attach discussions of previous versions:
>>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241114084816.1128647-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/
>>>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241122062051.3658577-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/
>>>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241216091603.1247644-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/
>>>> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250113122104.3870673-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists