[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022412-unlikable-aftermost-bc2a@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:54:10 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: jianqi.ren.cn@...driver.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, kvalo@...nel.org,
rand.sec96@...il.com, m@...s.ch, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhe.he@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] ssb: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in
ssb_device_uevent()
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 04:37:07PM +0800, jianqi.ren.cn@...driver.com wrote:
> From: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@...il.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 789c17185fb0f39560496c2beab9b57ce1d0cbe7 ]
>
> The ssb_device_uevent() function first attempts to convert the 'dev' pointer
> to 'struct ssb_device *'. However, it mistakenly dereferences 'dev' before
> performing the NULL check, potentially leading to a NULL pointer
> dereference if 'dev' is NULL.
>
> To fix this issue, move the NULL check before dereferencing the 'dev' pointer,
> ensuring that the pointer is valid before attempting to use it.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
> Link: https://msgid.link/20240306123028.164155-1-rand.sec96@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>
> ---
> Verified the build test.
> ---
> drivers/ssb/main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> index d52e91258e98..aae50a5dfb57 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> @@ -341,11 +341,13 @@ static int ssb_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>
> static int ssb_device_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
> {
> - struct ssb_device *ssb_dev = dev_to_ssb_dev(dev);
> + struct ssb_device *ssb_dev;
>
> if (!dev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + ssb_dev = dev_to_ssb_dev(dev);
This patch does nothing, sorry. It's impossible for dev to be null so
no need to verify this and I guess I'll go reject the cve that was
assigned to it as well as it's pointless.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists