lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c456101-6643-44d1-812a-2eae3bce9068@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:31:42 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
	Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP
 access

> What do you think will be the effect of such a warning?  Who is the
> target audience?

It will act as a disclaimer. The kernel is doing its best with broken
hardware, but don't blame the kernel when it does not work
correctly....

> You can obviously add it, and I don't really care.  But I believe the
> result will be an endless stream of end users worrying about this scary
> warning and wanting to know what they can do about it.  What will be
> your answer?

I agree that the wording needs to be though about. Maybe something
like:

This hardware is broken by design, and there is nothing the kernel, or
the community can do about it. The kernel will try its best, but some
standard SFP features are disabled, and the features which are
implemented may not work correctly because of the design errors. Use
with caution, and don't blame the kernel when it all goes horribly
wrong.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ