[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H4giTorYbo4uL_KNL1MmHWfWKX8EnhKdC_Yz0_sX17PvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:48:59 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Xinhui Pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/amd/display: Stop control flow if the divisior
is zero
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 9:29 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell, with the current existing macro definitions, there
> is no better way to do the minimal and proper changes to stop the control
> flow if the divisior is zero.
>
> In order to keep the current ability for the aim of debugging and avoid
> printing the warning message twice, it is better to only use ASSERT_BUG()
> and SPL_ASSERT_BUG() directly after doing the following two steps:
>
> (1) Add ASSERT_BUG() macro definition
> (2) Add SPL_ASSERT_BUG() macro definition
>
> This version is based on 6.13-rc7, tested on x86 and LoongArch.
Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
>
> Tiezhu Yang (3):
> drm/amd/display: Add ASSERT_BUG() macro definition
> drm/amd/display: Add SPL_ASSERT_BUG() macro definition
> drm/amd/display: Harden callers of division functions
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/basics/fixpt31_32.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/os_types.h | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/spl/spl_debug.h | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/spl/spl_fixpt31_32.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists