[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d035996-8b8f-3d3d-d41e-6573f8a76f31@gentwo.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:57:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
arnd@...db.de, lenb@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, harisokn@...zon.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com, sudeep.holla@....com, maz@...nel.org,
misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com, maobibo@...ngson.cn, zhenglifeng1@...wei.com,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/11] governors/haltpoll: drop kvm_para_available()
check
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Ankur Arora wrote:
> So, we can safely forgo the kvm_para_available() check. This also
> allows cpuidle-haltpoll to be tested on baremetal.
I would hope that we will have this functionality as the default on
baremetal after testing in the future.
Reviewed-by; Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@...ux.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists