lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7y0gJPD5-OQvyog@blossom>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:03:44 -0500
From: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
To: sven@...npeter.dev
Cc: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] soc: apple: rtkit: Add APPLE_RTKIT_PWR_STATE_INIT

> -	msg = FIELD_PREP(APPLE_RTKIT_MGMT_PWR_STATE, APPLE_RTKIT_PWR_STATE_ON);
> +	msg = FIELD_PREP(APPLE_RTKIT_MGMT_PWR_STATE, APPLE_RTKIT_PWR_STATE_INIT);

Commit message doesn't match the code. Just adding the state doesn't
imply a behaviour change but the patch is one. How about "Use INIT state
instead of ON" or something to make explicit the behaviour change?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ