[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250224170310.41c8611d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:03:10 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Joel
Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter
Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kaixiong Yu <yukaixiong@...wei.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in:
kernel/sysctl.c
between commit:
8aeacf257070 ("perf/core: Move perf_event sysctls into kernel/events")
from the tip tree and commit:
dccf3c99febf ("sysctl: remove unneeded include")
from the sysctl tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc kernel/sysctl.c
index 635f5e829fe8,eeb4cba12190..000000000000
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@@ -54,7 -47,7 +47,6 @@@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
- #include <linux/oom.h>
-#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/kmod.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/binfmts.h>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists