[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250224164956-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:51:20 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
German Maglione <gmaglione@...hat.com>, stefanha@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vduse: add virtio_fs to allowed dev id
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:33:46AM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> A VDUSE device that implements virtiofs device works fine just by
> adding the device id to the whitelist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>
OK, but the commit log really should say why
you are doing this. And also why is it safe.
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> index 7ae99691efdf..6a9a37351310 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *vduse_irq_bound_wq;
> static u32 allowed_device_id[] = {
> VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK,
> VIRTIO_ID_NET,
> + VIRTIO_ID_FS,
> };
>
> static inline struct vduse_dev *vdpa_to_vduse(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> --
> 2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists