[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af1d819a-4782-4b56-9e60-20263930bf19@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:26:17 +0530
From: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
To: Parvathi Pudi <parvathi@...thit.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: rogerq <rogerq@...nel.org>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <nm@...com>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
basharath
<basharath@...thit.com>, <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
diogo ivo
<diogo.ivo@...mens.com>, <m-karicheri2@...com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, "jacob e
keller" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
<m-malladi@...com>,
javier carrasco cruz
<javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, <afd@...com>,
<s-anna@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pratheesh
<pratheesh@...com>,
Prajith Jayarajan <prajith@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, <praneeth@...com>,
<srk@...com>, <rogerq@...com>, krishna
<krishna@...thit.com>,
pmohan <pmohan@...thit.com>, mohan <mohan@...thit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] PRU-ICSSM Ethernet Driver
Hi Parvathi,
On 18/02/25 3:36 pm, Parvathi Pudi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:16:52 +0530 parvathi wrote:
>>> The Programmable Real-Time Unit Industrial Communication Sub-system (PRU-ICSS)
>>> is available on the TI SOCs in two flavors: Gigabit ICSS (ICSSG) and the older
>>> Megabit ICSS (ICSSM).
>>
>> Every individual patch must build cleanly with W=1.
>> Otherwise doing git bisections is a miserable experience.
>> --
>
> As we mentioned in cover letter we have dependency with SOC patch.
>
> "These patches have a dependency on an SOC patch, which we are including at the
> end of this series for reference. The SOC patch has been submitted in a separate
> thread [2] and we are awaiting for it to be merged."
>
> SOC patch need to be applied prior applying the "net" patches. We have changed the
> order and appended the SOC patch at the end, because SOC changes need to go into
> linux-next but not into net-next.
>
> We have make sure every individual patch has compiled successfully with W=1 if we
> apply SOC patch prior to the "net" patches.
>
If there is any dependency in the series, the pre-requisite patch should
come before the dependent patch. In this series, SoC Patch should have
been the patch 1/10 and the warnings could have been avoided.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Parvathi.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Danish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists