[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f810b8a2-4261-4b68-b59b-4efa0219b5db@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:10:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] dt-binding: clock: ast2700: modify soc0/1 clock
define
On 24/02/2025 10:55, Ryan Chen wrote:
> -remove redundant SOC0_CLK_UART_DIV13:
> SOC0_CLK_UART_DIV13 is not use at clk-ast2700.c, the clock
> source tree is uart clk src -> uart_div_table -> uart clk.
>
> -Change SOC0_CLK_HPLL_DIV_AHB to SOC0_CLK_AHBMUX:
> modify clock tree implement.
> older CLK_AHB use mpll_div_ahb/hpll_div_ahb to be ahb clock source.
> mpll->mpll_div_ahb
> -> clk_ahb
> hpll->hpll_div_ahb
I can barely understand it and from the pieces I got, it does not
explain need for ABI break.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists