[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250224101343.476200215@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:15:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [patch 08/11] posix-timers: Make per process list RCU safe
Preparatory change to remove the sighand locking from the /proc/$PID/timers
iterator.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int do_timer_create(clockid_t whi
* unmodified signal pointer to make it valid.
*/
WRITE_ONCE(new_timer->it_signal, current->signal);
- hlist_add_head(&new_timer->list, ¤t->signal->posix_timers);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&new_timer->list, ¤t->signal->posix_timers);
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
/*
* After unlocking sighand::siglock @new_timer is subject to
@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int posix_timer_delete(struct k_i
unsigned long sig = (unsigned long)timer->it_signal | 1UL;
WRITE_ONCE(timer->it_signal, (struct signal_struct *)sig);
- hlist_del(&timer->list);
+ hlist_del_rcu(&timer->list);
posix_timer_cleanup_ignored(timer);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists