[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7xSfVME4z2ComUm@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:05:33 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Drop mte_allowed check during memslot
creation
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:09:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> Before commit d89585fbb308 ("KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in
> memslots when MTE is enabled"), kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() only
> rejected a memory slot if VM_SHARED was set. This commit unified the
> checking with user_mem_abort(), with slots being rejected if either
> VM_MTE_ALLOWED is not set or VM_SHARED set. A subsequent commit
> c911f0d46879 ("KVM: arm64: permit all VM_MTE_ALLOWED mappings with MTE
> enabled") dropped the VM_SHARED check, so we ended up with memory slots
> being rejected if VM_MTE_ALLOWED is not set. This wasn't the case before
> the commit d89585fbb308. The rejection of the memory slot with VM_SHARED
> set was done to avoid a race condition with the test/set of the
> PG_mte_tagged flag. Before Commit d77e59a8fccd ("arm64: mte: Lock a page
> for MTE tag initialization") the kernel avoided allowing MTE with shared
> pages, thereby preventing two tasks sharing a page from setting up the
> PG_mte_tagged flag racily.
>
> Commit d77e59a8fccd ("arm64: mte: Lock a page for MTE tag
> initialization") further updated the locking so that the kernel
> allows VM_SHARED mapping with MTE. With this commit, we can enable
> memslot creation with VM_SHARED VMA mapping.
>
> This patch results in a minor tweak to the ABI. We now allow creating
> memslots that don't have the VM_MTE_ALLOWED flag set.
As I commented here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z4e04P1bQlFBDHo7@arm.com
I'm fine with the change, we basically go back to the original ABI prior
to relaxing this for VM_SHARED.
> If the guest uses
> such a memslot with Allocation Tags, the kernel will generate -EFAULT.
> ie, instead of failing early, we now fail later during KVM_RUN.
Nit: more like the kernel "will return -EFAULT" to the VMM rather than
"generate".
> This change is needed because, without it, users are not able to use MTE
> with VFIO passthrough (currently the mapping is either Device or
> NonCacheable for which tag access check is not applied.), as shown
> below (kvmtool VMM).
Another nit: "users are not able to user VFIO passthrough when MTE is
enabled". At a first read, the above sounded to me like one wants to
enable MTE for VFIO passthrough mappings.
> [ 617.921030] vfio-pci 0000:01:00.0: resetting
> [ 618.024719] vfio-pci 0000:01:00.0: reset done
> Error: 0000:01:00.0: failed to register region with KVM
> Warning: [0abc:aced] Error activating emulation for BAR 0
> Error: 0000:01:00.0: failed to configure regions
> Warning: Failed init: vfio__init
>
> Fatal: Initialisation failed
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index ef53af6df6de..1f1b5aa43d2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2178,11 +2178,6 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> if (!vma)
> break;
>
> - if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && !kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) {
> /* IO region dirty page logging not allowed */
> if (new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists