linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: defconfig: enable STM32 LP timers drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250225-vague-tuscan-shark-ebec44@krzk-bin>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:00:14 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, ukleinek@...nel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, 
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, wbg@...nel.org, 
	jic23@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
	olivier.moysan@...s.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: defconfig: enable STM32 LP timers drivers

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 09:43:58AM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 2/25/25 08:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 24/02/2025 19:01, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> >> Enable the STM32 timer drivers: MFD, counter, PWM and trigger as modules.
> >> Clocksource is a bool, hence set to y. These drivers can be used on
> >> STM32MP25.
> > 
> > 
> > Which upstream board? If you do not have upstream board, the defconfig
> > is pointless for us. It's not defconfig for your downstream forks.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> It's going to be used on stm32mp257f-dk and stm32mp257f-ev1 boards.

The defconfig commit should mention which upstream products use it.

> I can add the relevant DT for the(se) board(s) in next revision.

Does this mean there are no upstream users of this? Then this defconfig
change is no-op. We do not add enable things in defconfig just because
there is some downstream/fork using something. Defconfig is for our
(upstream) boards.

Best regards,
Krzysztof