lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250225-pelican-of-pleasurable-might-e9a7e8@krzk-bin>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:02:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, ukleinek@...nel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, 
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, wbg@...nel.org, 
	jic23@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
	olivier.moysan@...s.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] counter: stm32-lptimer-cnt: add support for stm32mp25

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 07:01:48PM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> Add support for STM32MP25 SoC. Use newly introduced compatible to handle
> this new HW variant, even if no major change is expected on the counter
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/counter/stm32-lptimer-cnt.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/stm32-lptimer-cnt.c b/drivers/counter/stm32-lptimer-cnt.c
> index b249c8647639..a5dce017c37b 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/stm32-lptimer-cnt.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/stm32-lptimer-cnt.c
> @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm32_lptim_cnt_pm_ops, stm32_lptim_cnt_suspend,
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id stm32_lptim_cnt_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "st,stm32-lptimer-counter", },
> +	{ .compatible = "st,stm32mp25-lptimer-counter", },

So fully compatible? Why this change then?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ